Small on purpose
We take a few projects at a time so you work with the people writing the code — not a chain of account managers, then a team you never met.
About
The people you'llactually work with.
We're four engineers, working together full-time. The first conversation is with the people who will write the code — not a salesperson, and not a bench we staff later.
- Team
- 4 engineers
- How we work
- Full-time
- First call
- Free
- Based
- Bengaluru, remote
Why we exist
We started this because the usual options were a bad fit.
Most companies in our position get two choices: hire a large firm and rarely meet the people doing the work, or hire contractors and hope the next person can read the last person's decisions. We wanted a third option — a small studio you can actually know.
The two of us who started VerityTech studied computer science at the Indian Institutes of Technology, then spent years building products at Microsoft and at a Silicon Valley company. We brought in engineers we would trust on a hard problem: people with the same standard, not the same diploma.
We stay small on purpose. A few projects at a time. A second engineer on every change. A written plan before anyone quotes. And a handoff you can run without us.
How the studio is built
What you can count on when you hire us.
Principals on the work
The people on the first call are the people in the repository. We do not swap a founder for a junior bench once the contract is signed.
Written before we quote
Two free conversations, then a plan you can evaluate: the outcome, the constraints, the risks, and what it should cost. If we are the wrong fit, we say so then.
Built to be left
Documentation, runbooks, and our access removed at handoff. Further help is a new conversation — optional, never assumed, never leftover login rights.
The studio
Four people. Visible. Accountable.
You'll know who is on the work. The studio stays small on purpose — a few people, each one someone you can reach.
Fig. 01Co-founder
Product systems
Co-founder
- Microsoft
- Computer science, IIT
Starts from the business outcome and stays with the product after launch. Previously built software at Microsoft.
Bengaluru
Fig. 02Co-founder
Systems and architecture
Co-founder
- Silicon Valley
- Computer science, IIT
Maps the constraints, the risks, and the architecture before significant build work. Has built products inside a Silicon Valley company.
Bengaluru
Fig. 03Engineer
Integrations and reliability
Engineer
- Product teams
Connects the tools and data a business already runs on, and makes the next change safer than the last one.
Bengaluru
Fig. 04Engineer
Product software
Engineer
- Product teams
Builds the screens, the rules, and the operating path together — not the interface as if it were the whole product.
Bengaluru
Where the judgment comes from
Microsoft. Silicon Valley. And IIT.
You hire people who have shipped in rooms you recognize — and who will still be in the room after launch. The school is how the founders met. It is not the whole studio.
Microsoft
One founder built product software at Microsoft. That is the proof that travels: large systems, real users, and the discipline of shipping inside a company you already know.
Silicon Valley
The other founder has built inside a Silicon Valley company — the pace, the constraints, and the expectation that software has to keep working after the demo.
IIT
The founders trained in computer science at the Indian Institutes of Technology, among the most selective engineering schools in the world. It is how they met. It is not the whole studio.
The rest of the room
The other engineers were chosen the same way we choose work: by the standard of the person, not the brand on a diploma. You will meet them too.
Working with us
Hours, access, and who you talk to.
Hours that overlap
Remote-first from Bengaluru. We lock a working-hour overlap in the first conversation — typically US mornings — so a decision does not wait a day.
You talk to the engineers
No telephone game. Decisions are written down. The person who quotes the work is the person who will do it.
Access, then none
We request only the access and data the work needs, protect secrets, and remove our access at the agreed handoff.
You own the work
The statement of work says so. At handoff you receive what you need to run and continue the system without depending on us.
What we believe
The decisions we keep.
The first release is not the finish line
We take work where the software has to stay correct, stay connected, and stay understandable after we leave.
A selective partner is cheaper than the wrong one
If the work is staff augmentation, a marketing-only site, or 24/7 operations, we will say so early — and, where we can, point you elsewhere.
Trade-offs should be visible before you pay for them
Every architecture has costs. We write down what you are gaining, accepting, and deferring, so you can decide with the facts in front of you.
Meet us before you decide.
The first conversation is free. Bring the outcome, the system you have today, and what is getting in the way.